> As I probably lack the skills to deal with that, I would like that > some of you interested in batik (if only because you're one of the > rdepends) check that the newer version works as you expected. Batik is > in the pkg-java SVN repository (check out the QA page).
As I was the one who updated batik in Ubuntu I want to ask few comments about the differences between Ubuntu packaging and Debian packaging. I haven't yet tried to build the package. 1. Are you sure following change is correct - * Removing 02_fix_jar_target, no longer applicable The reason I ask is because I refreshed that patch in Ubuntu. If you remove that patch you end up with same class files in batik-all-1.7.jar as well as batik-libs-1.7.jar files i.e. files that should go only in batik-ext-1.7.jar will be included in batik-libs-1.7.jar. 2. You have not added 'xmlgraphics-commons-1.2' and 'xml-apis-ext' to DEB_JARS. This is likely to cause build failure on build server. In case I get enough time to verify it in pbuilder I will let you know. 3. Also Ubuntu version contains following symlinks which you may want to add to Debian version as well. batik-ext.jar -> batik-ext-1.7.jar batik-libs.jar -> batik-libs-1.7.jar batik-1.7.jar -> batik-all-1.7.jar batik-all.jar -> batik-all-1.7.jar batik.jar -> batik-all-1.7.jar I will let you know if find any more important differences. Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
