Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From a user point of view, but that may be less relevant, bazaar is > much less easy to integrate and understand than non distributed CVS > live Subversion.
In what way? I've not heard of CVS live Subversion, but once you understand the basic idea of version control, I think it's not too much of a step either to centralised shared servers (CVS, Subversion) where the version control storage is (usually, but not necessarily) in a remote place and you take a local copy; or a distributed system, where the version control storage is local but you can merge in from a remote place. Maybe if you've only used version control with remote storage, then you need to first see that those two things are not necessarily tied. As noted, version control seems not a very common skill among translators yet, so is this a widespread problem? If we try to educate translators about version control, let's try to make it clear that where the storage is doesn't change the basic ideas of version control. Personally, I think most distributed systems don't dictate workflow as much, so would prefer to see one adopted if possible. Regards, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Webmaster/web developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop maker, developer of koha, debian, gobo, gnustep, various mail and web s/w. Workers co-op @ Weston-super-Mare, Somerset http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
