On 13/07/15 14:15, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > > On 13/07/2015 12:50, sebastic wrote: >> On 2015-07-13 13:40, Alastair McKinstry wrote: >>> So, whats the current status of the netCDF transition? >> >> We still need to verify all reverse dependencies before we can request > a transition slot. >> > Ok, I'll start with my packages then. Experimental builds. >>> What about collisions with the gcc-5 transition? >> >> The GCC-5 related transitions are going to be painful, that's why I > hope to get the gdal & spatialite transitions done before GCC-5, but it > seems unlikely. >> > Yes. This gets confusing. > > I have a package libdap, upon which gdal depends. Its just undergone a > transition 3.12 -> 3.14.0 that included SONAME changes. It has two > rdepends, gdal and grads. I had set an RC bug against libdap to block
No. There was no RC bug at all. > it from transitioning until g++-5 transition (as it has c++11 symbol > changes) but its been removed and libdap 3.14.0 has transitioned. > gdal has been binNMU'd and will transition. Right. > So what happens? Does testing get rebuilt with g++-5 ? (unlikely, but a > good idea, I think), Not going to happen. > or is another transition necessary for > libdapclient6 -> libdapclient6v5 with the g++ transition? You need another transition if the ABI changes with the new libstdc++. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
