I don't mind at all! Just go ahead and push it. I'm just happy when this lands upstream.
Cheers, Nico On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:06 PM Ross Gammon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nico, > > To get netcdf-cxx-legacy moving (it will take a while through the NEW > queue), I just filed an ITP bug and an RFS bug and hopefully Bas will be > able to sponsor the upload soon. I hope you don't mind. > > This is a bit cheeky as it is all yours and Bas's work. > > If you need help to get through the ITP/RFS process next time just sing > out. You were at the final hurdle! > > Regards, > > Ross > > On 06/18/2015 09:17 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > Ah okay, I had been under the impression that the new C++ interface will > > be called `libnetcdfcxx`. If both bear the same name, one is encouraged > > to look up the difference though. This should be fine. > > > > --Nico > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:55 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On 06/18/2015 08:25 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > > Not sure if this is a good idea. After all, the currently > > developed C++ > > > interface is called `netcdf-cxx4` on the Unidata side, see [1]. If > the > > > legacy version goes by the same name on Debian, one may easily get > > confused. > > > > I don't think the similar binary package names are a problem. > > > > The dependencies generated with the help of the symbols files will > make > > sure the correct library will be used. > > > > The package description synopsis differentiate the two C++ libraries: > > > > Package: libnetcdf-c++4-1 > > Description: C++ interface for scientific data access to large > > binary data > > > > Package: libnetcdf-c++4 > > Description: legacy NetCDF C++ interface > > > > We may want to change the synopsis or extended description for > -legacy > > to mention NetCDF-3 explicitly. > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Bas > > > > -- > > >
