Hi Guillem, Quoting Guillem Jover (2013-10-21 07:31:23) > Sorry, I lost track of this, was meaning to get into this but got pulled into > something else. I've added it now to my TODO list for stuff do deal with > before 1.17.2 (a release I don't really want to drag much more than a week or > two at most).
do you need any help, for example by refining any of the patches that we have submitted? > Anyway, I've to say that I've found the overall tone in the thread in > debian-devel pretty unpleasant. Lots of things in dpkg might “block” someone > from doing something or might make it more difficult, and those things might > be “critical” for small parts of the project and completely irrelevant for > the rest. I want to apologize if I was at any point using an improper tone in my communication with you. It is just frustrating for me to have spent so much energy on the bootstrappable-Debian project during the past 1.5 years and not seeing it go anywhere due to no decision being made. This influenced my language and I hope you can accept my apology for any harm that was done. > Also having every second mail add a slightly different proposal means one has > to reset their mental model every time and reconsider any new global > implications and similar, which might not help either. True, and each of us has contributed to this mess of now about five (?) different ways of implementing having a different set of build dependencies for bootstrapping purposes. It became like deciding for the color of the bikeshed during the last few iterations so I'll be happy with whatever decision you make as to which proposal to pick. Thanks a lot for your work. cheers, josch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131023155626.24657.61049@hoothoot
