Wookey wrote: > +++ Guillem Jover [2013-08-16 14:15 +0200]: >> I've been pondering about the (old) updated proposal, and while I can >> see Ian's argument and can agree with the problems he presents, I >> can't really see using a syntax like «pkg [foo] [bar]» as something >> desirable given the current context. > > As josch pointed out, it would actually be pkg [foo], pkg [bar]
How does this syntax represent an arch-specific, profile-specific dependency? pkg [foo], pkg [bar] is two dependencies and would result in the package being installed too often. [...] > We're absolutely fine with the <> syntax, which is already implemented > (and to be honest I prefer the look of it in practice). Ok, that makes the question moot. :) Thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130816191027.gc4...@google.com
