Hi, On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 12:31:17 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > To get this issue moving, I have attached a patch which implements the <> > version of the proposal. The patch is based upon one by wookey and pehjota [1] > and adds testcases, namespace support and the ability to activate more than > one > profile at once.
> Let me repeat again that this issue has been open for years and if an > implementation is everything that is needed then here you go. Please review > and > comment on my patch. I will implement any fixes necessary so that this issue > can go forward. Sorry, I lost track of this, was meaning to get into this but got pulled into something else. I've added it now to my TODO list for stuff do deal with before 1.17.2 (a release I don't really want to drag much more than a week or two at most). Anyway, I've to say that I've found the overall tone in the thread in debian-devel pretty unpleasant. Lots of things in dpkg might “block” someone from doing something or might make it more difficult, and those things might be “critical” for small parts of the project and completely irrelevant for the rest. Also having every second mail add a slightly different proposal means one has to reset their mental model every time and reconsider any new global implications and similar, which might not help either. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131021053123.ga20...@gaara.hadrons.org
