Steve Greenland: > > Hmm, it's ok for you to "misrepresent" other people's arguments, but not > > the other way around, as follows:
Craig Sanders: > > > so why do you have a problem with infrastructure (i.e. package pools in > > > one form or another) which makes it easier to build a snapshot image? Steve Greenland: > > (And you *are* mispresenting my point, because you completely ignored > > the next paragraph where I spoke favorably about package pools.) Here's what Steve wrote: > > > > If you want to work on the unstable stuff, I think the > > > > package-pool implementation would good place to start. Craig Sanders: > notice that i asked questions. it up to you to confirm or deny or ignore > a question. Statements are confirmed or denied, not questions. Questions are answered. There's a gigantic difference between these two questions: "do you have a problem with infrastructure (i.e. package pools ...)?" "why do you have a problem with infrastructure (i.e. package pools ...)?" You wrote the latter, which clearly misrepresents what Steve wrote. You seem like a smart guy, so I can only assume you were being dishonest, and not just incompetent. Combine that with your selfishness, your arrogance, and your excessive, unnecessary, and juvenile obscenity, and here's what you get: *plonk* -- Brian Kimball
