[ ok I'll keep calm this time ] Le Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:03:18PM +1100, Craig Sanders écrivait: > right. one of them for a package (spamdb) which doesn't even exist > anymore so it's a bit difficult to see how it could be "release > critical".
That's possible, but then it would be great if you could close all the bugs related to spamdb so that they won't burden us anymore ... > two of them for the same package (vtun). again, they hardly seem > "release critical" Then it's your job to lower the priority and/or to close them. I don't want more from maintainer, I just want that they do what they have to and it's not that much ... it's not difficult to check once a week your page on the BTS. > most of the rest have actually been fixed, but i must have got the BTS > syntax wrong when closing the bugs in the changelog. The same problem applies to many developers, but that must change, when a bug is gone, it must be closed in the BTS or the BTS will be worthless one day or another. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog >> 0C4CABF1 >> http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/ <pub> CD Debian : http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/debian/#cd Formations Linux et logiciels libres : http://www.logidee.com </pub>
