On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 08:41:01PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 15-Mar-00, 01:06 (CST), Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > DO NOT PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH. > > > > your "argument" for want of a better term is obviously so poor that you > > have no choice but to misrepresent mine to make your "points". > > Hmm, it's ok for you to "misrepresent" other people's arguments, but not > the other way around, as follows: > > > so why do you have a problem with infrastructure (i.e. package pools in > > one form or another) which makes it easier to build a snapshot image? > > > > do you have some kind of aversion to automating tedious and > > time-consuming tasks? > > DO NOT PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH.
notice that i asked questions. it up to you to confirm or deny or ignore a question. it implicitly gives you the opportunity to accept or refute the query, without a prejudgement of the situation. what you did was quite different. you came up with a reprehensible misinterpretation of what i said and what my views are, and then projected it onto me. you *stated* that your offensive misrepresentation was my position. do you comprehend the difference? > your "argument" for want of a better term is obviously so poor that you > have no choice but to misrepresent mine to make your "points". > > (And you *are* mispresenting my point, because you completely ignored > the next paragraph where I spoke favorably about package pools.) no, i stated that you made no points. that was a) true, and b) nothing like deliberately misrepresenting your points. > > and fuck you too! how dare you fucking misrepresent my position and > > twist what i said in such a reprehensible manner? > > Why not? You do it to everybody else. fuck off, lying scum. > In the meantime, <plonk!> "plonk" your fucking self. arsehole. craig -- craig sanders
