On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 05:59:07PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > The criterion should be utility.
wrong. we've had this censorship discussion many times before. the only criteria for inclusion in debian is: - is it free? - could someone be bothered doing the work of packaging it? if the answer to both questions is yes, then there is no justification for refusing the package. > The Bible as a literary and cultural foundation of Western > civilization will be useful to a lot more people than the Anarchism > package. 'utility' is a subjective thing. i personally would find the anarchist faq far more useful and interesting than (a bad translation of) religious texts. craig -- craig sanders
