Soren Stoutner <so...@debian.org> writes: > At this point in the discussion I would like to progress toward a decision. > > One way to do so would be a GR. On one hand, using a GR to modify one line > of the code of conduct for the mailing list seems like a rather large hammer > for a rather small problem. But on the other hand, many people feel strongly > enough about this that a GR might be the only mechanism where people will > feel like the outcome is fair. > > My question is, is there any other decision making process that would be > preferable to a GR to decide this issue?
You seem to be under the impression that there's an emerging consensus in favour of your idea. From my reading of this thread, the only real consensus seems to be that format=flowed is a good idea (as a result of which I intend to persuade my mail setup to generate that when I've got a moment). I doubt that a GR is justified, especially if all it's going to end up doing is adding a recommendation for format=flowed to the CoC that isn't actually required for people to adopt the use of format=flowed. Cheers, Phil. -- Philip Hands -- https://hands.com/~phil
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
