perl -e 'for($t=0;;$t++){print chr($t*($t>>8|$t>>13)&255)}' |aplay
> Part of the trick here is that the fsync()s are skipped, but I think
> even if none of the above were problems, then we'd still need to >
fsync() stuff to get the actual filesystem entries to make sense, so >
the currently missing directory fsync()s might be a worse problem for >
such reflinking than the proposed disabled file data fsync()s in the >
patch. But I've not checked how reflinking interacts in general with >
fsync()s, etc. Hi, I've removed the fsync() just because when using
reflinks there isn't any file data to flush. If you reintroduce them,
the performances will not vary that much. Regards, -- Matteo Croce
- Re: A 2025 NewYear p... Michael Stone
- Re: A 2025 NewYear p... Bálint Réczey
- Re: A 2025 NewYear p... Bernhard Schmidt
- Re: A 2025 NewYear p... Ahmad Khalifa
- Re: A 2025 NewYear p... Aurélien COUDERC
- Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg --force-... Aaron Rainbolt
- Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg --force-... Simon Josefsson
- Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg --force-... Guillem Jover
- Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg --force-... Gioele Barabucci
- Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg --f... Guillem Jover
- Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg... Matteo Croce
- Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make ... Matteo Croce
- Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg --force-... Ángel
- Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg --f... Julien Plissonneau Duquène
- Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg... Ángel
- Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make ... Julien Plissonneau Duquène