Ansgar 🙀, le ven. 20 déc. 2024 12:01:24 +0100, a ecrit:
> On Fri, 2024-12-20 at 11:50 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > What I completely fail to understand is why people would want to not
> > see any file in /etc. What harm does it *actually* cause?
> 
> It makes it hard to see what was actually configured: there is random
> configuration bits, possibly from a random older version of the
> package, intermixed with local configuration.
> 
> With empty-/etc, you would (ideally) only have explicit local
> configuration in /etc which makes it much, much easier to see what the
> local admin changed to diagnose problems, prepare upgrades and so on.
> This is practically impossible now.

ucf should be able to provide this?

Put another way: it's not the presence of files in /etc that poses
problem. It's not having the shipped version at hand for comparing it.
Let's fix that rather than dropping something which is useful to admins.

> It also avoids the problem of removed-but-not-purged packages.

With files copied into /etc, you will still have configuration files
lying around, and *not tracked*.

Samuel

Reply via email to