Otto Kekäläinen <o...@debian.org> writes: > Thanks Gioele for the stats. I noticed that 90% of the votes came in > the first two days. > > In this system you can unvote and put your thumbs up on another > proposal if you want to change your mind now after letting the > question sink in for a few weeks, but please make sure you have voted > only on one option. Double votes will be manually nullified at final > count as there is no technical way to prevent it. > > I have been pondering about this myself and decided today to cast my > own vote on DEP0 > (https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/15) as I have > seen so much of RFC822, dep3, dep8 and DEP14 in use in many places. > > I will count the final status on Dec 17th so that they have been open > for 30 days, and then follow up with MR to implement the winning > option.
Wouldn't another option be to allow for multiple ways to write things, as long as they are consistently written in the same style for the same purpose? I prefer writing DEP 4711 in text. I prefer writing https://example.org/dep4711.txt in URLs. I prefer writing [DEP-4711] as a reference keyword. The main trouble now seems like the styles aren't used consistently, so references can look like [DEP4711] and [DEP-4711] and [DEP 4711] in an inconsistent way. Fixing that seems more important than uniforming all possible expressions. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
