Hi! On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 00:48:18 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > I am the kind of person that gets hugely annoyed by things like this. > Is anyone else feeling it? >· > Can we agree on calling Debian Enhancement Proposals DEP-N with a dash?
I'm also all for consistency, although I'm in general more annoyed when I see references to DEP-N in debian/changelogs, with no context or human explanation to what it refers to, instead of say "machine readable changelog", as I have a tendency to forget these context-less numbered specifications (I think I've only ever involuntarily committed into memory RFC822/RFC2822, RFC4880/RFC9580, and iso-8859?), and we do not even have that many DEPs. :) Thanks, Guillem
