On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 09:44:03PM +0200, Lukas Märdian wrote: > > However, I do not think it should be the default. First of all, only > > Ubuntu uses it, nobody else - as Simon says, we don't want the > > defaults to be super-special things that nobody else uses. And then > > Actually, I think this is an agrument FOR Netplan, not against it. Netplan is > being used > by millions of users for 7+ years. Plenty of usecases have been tried and > documented. It's > clearly not a "super-special thing that nodbody uses". > > Whereas I'm not aware of a major Linux distro using systemd-networkd > directly, Debian would be > singeling out itself. I see some of networkd's strengths with advanced users > who want to dig deep > and have full control at minimal resource usage (e.g. Arch Linux). Also with > lightweight container > usecases, where network config only needs minimal manipulation after > deployment (if at all). > > The RedHat ecosystem is all-in on NetworkManager. Debian and Ubuntu have > (natually) been very close > to each other (e.g. package management) and together with its derivatives > create the Debian ecosystem.
Then it looks like a chance for netplan to go the way of upstart? -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
