Hi, On 11.07.24 18:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
* Package name : dh-rust Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Contact: build-common team <team+build-com...@tracker.debian.org> * URL : https://salsa.debian.org/build-common-team/dh-rust
This ("build-common") reminded me of cdbs. Can we not have another schism and actually work together?
cdbs also got orphaned but its legacy not cleaned up. I still count 1.6k reverse build-depends in unstable.
I'd - at the very least - would like to see a statement why a fork is necessary. Innovation can happen in forks. But they don't necessarily need to be in the archive to make a point.
Kind regards Philipp Kern
