On the privacy topic... Slides: https://irtf.org/anrw/2019/slides-anrw19-final44.pdf Paper: https://dl.acm.org/authorize.cfm?key=N687437
And you can get to the video recording from the ANRW 2019 pages: https://irtf.org/anrw/2019/program.html We can discuss (and it has been discussed) ad nauseam, but the point is that nobody (certainly I am not) is asking for crippling DoH, but I just strongly believe it’s in the line with other Debian work that we should not send data to 3rd party DNS service without explicit user consent. Otherwise it doesn’t make any sense to remove external links to logos and JavaScript from the documentation and then send everything to one single US-based provider. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> > On 8 Sep 2019, at 23:29, Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> wrote: > > On Sep 08, Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> wrote: > >> I would rather see an explicit statement. I would be very surprised >> with Debian’s usual stance regarding the users’ privacy that we would >> not consider this as a privacy violation, but again I am not Firefox >> maintainer in Debian and I would rather hear from them than speculate >> on my own. > I think that this is a privacy enhancement, since it prevents some major > ISPs from spying on users DNS queries. When it will be enabled in other > countries it will prevent government-mandated (or "encouraged") > censorship. > It would be a terrible signal if Debian decided to disable an > anti-censoship feature provided by an upstream vendor. > > -- > ciao, > Marco
