On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 11:34:19PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > On 6/15/19 12:28 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Adam Borowski wrote: > > > >> Thus, what would you guys say about a new distribution, "scratch"? It > >> would > >> be a kind of extra-experimental that doesn't put its build results anywhere > >> persistent. Throwing away built .debs would be ok, keeping just logs. > > > > Perhaps I'm missing something but would introducing more architectures > > to the salsa.debian.org continuous integrations runners not serve > > mostly the same purpose? The developer's workflow would simply be to > > push a commit and it would be built and tested automatically. > afaik the CI runners use k8s to schedule their work, so I think using > the default CI stuff from gitlab requires an architecture supported by > k8s. arm64 is supported and I know that some people cross-compiled k8s > for mips(el?), but I doubt its widely supported. > > Am I missing something?
No, that's not the case. That is, it is *possible* to use kubernetes to do GitLab CI, but it is in no way a requirement. gitlab-runner has various executors to do stuff, and running something inside docker (with or without kubernetes) is just one of the many options. -- To the thief who stole my anti-depressants: I hope you're happy -- seen somewhere on the Internet on a photo of a billboard
