Adam Borowski wrote:
> Thus, what would you guys say about a new distribution, "scratch"? It would
> be a kind of extra-experimental that doesn't put its build results anywhere
> persistent. Throwing away built .debs would be ok, keeping just logs.
Perhaps I'm missing something but would introducing more architectures
to the salsa.debian.org continuous integrations runners not serve
mostly the same purpose? The developer's workflow would simply be to
push a commit and it would be built and tested automatically.
This approach would also appear to cover more use-cases, require less
DSA attention ,and even allow non-DD/DMs to utilise the service too.
(I would concede that this would essentially require adopting a salsa
and Git-based packaging scheme, however.)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
