Am Freitag, den 02.03.2018, 07:39 -0500 schrieb Scott Kitterman: > On Friday, March 02, 2018 01:00:57 PM Gert Wollny wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > as the one who is the uploader of the package that is currently > > longest > > in the NEW pipeline (vtk7), I'd like to make a proposal how > > transparency and also the interaction from non ftp-master members > > to > > review packages could be improved. > > > > Short version: Use the salsa per-package issue tracker for problems > > that come up with the review in NEW. > > > > No. I think the short version of your proposal is: > > If the FTP team spent more time on tracking status more stuff would > get through New.
There is a reason why I wrote "reviewes" in my proposal, and not "ftp- master": this kind of tracking could be an incentive for more people to get involved reviewing other peoples packages, because it gives a clear path for contribution, and adding to it what I wrote as answer to Samuel, there is also the possibility for recognition of this review work by adding an "Reviewed-By:" entry to the changelog. Apart from that, I would guess is that the ftp team already does some tracking. best, Gert
