Am Freitag, den 02.03.2018, 13:38 +0100 schrieb Philip Hands: > Gert Wollny <gw.foss...@gmail.com> writes: > ... > > Short version: Use the salsa per-package issue tracker for problems > > that come up with the review in NEW. > > Is there any significant benefit that this brings over having the > same interaction in the BTS?
In salsa you get the links to the commits automatically, in the BTS one would have to set these manually I guess. That was my main incentive to propose this. > I realise that Gitlab is the new shiny thing, but there is a cost to > using two issue tracking mechanisms when one would do, > and for packages where the maintainer is not actually using salsa, > what then? Then add to my proposal: For packages that are maintained on salsa, but I guess one could also manage everything in the BTS.
