Sorry. Not meant for list. :( On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Tom H <tomh0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Off-list. > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> What is the advantage of having a optional-merged-/usr? > > Imagine the opposition if this had been proposed as a non-optional change! > > (BTW, I'll take this opportunity to thank you for two of your recent > proposals, the re-work of the list of packages to be installed by > default and the re-naming of the security suite. Thanks!)
- Re: support for merg... Russ Allbery
- Re: support for merg... Marc Haber
- Re: support for merg... Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: support for merg... Nikolaus Rath
- Re: support for merg... Ian Jackson
- Re: support for merg... Christian Seiler
- Re: support for merg... Nikolaus Rath
- Re: support for merg... Craig Small
- Re: support for merg... Ansgar Burchardt
- Re: support for merg... Tom H
- Re: support for merg... Tom H
- Re: support for merg... Simon McVittie
- Improving recovery (... Ole Laursen
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Andreas Henriksson
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Marco d'Itri
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Paul Gevers
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Ben Hutchings
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Paul Wise
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Simon McVittie
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Paul Wise