On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 12:33:19PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > In the Packages files for binaries, we could eliminate a *massive* > amount of redundancy by having a dedicated Packages file for "all", to > avoid duplicating entries into every architecture's Packages file.
See [1]. However there is additional logic in dak that hides newer arch:all packages if the corresponding binary has not been built yet. (Or adds the older arch:all binary in addition?) That would no longer be possible. Kind regards Philipp Kern [1] http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-all/Packages.gz Interesting if you need to know which arch:all need building given the constraint above.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
