-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 24/08/15 22:02, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> We have pushed other archive-wide goals that were not shared by > all upstreams. For example, we have enabled hardening build flags > on almost all packages and for packages that don't obey to the > appropriate flags, bugs with severity "important" were filed. > That's not that different of a reproducible build. Sorry, but it's a *completely* different situation. The hardening initiative made applications more secure and tamper resistant. The r-b changes do nothing useful post-build. Colin - -- Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1223 830814 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 143369 | 0x38C9D903 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV240FAAoJEPoMQQc4ydkDHmsP/R5evll9FAHE6luNzgU7dzuS mF0/J4jdqi9TLBZ3IbrLFEBdOM2ojgfRnW+QMBMc5CSorbidSSsHcXg50/1rdImQ X5/EVBa33YafGDEWg26HZnB1I0NAsLbiNVtafDs2KFrSrC0DomsVyveOr82HhoUD BRzYE5eiOpovITKgkIcNLoa20COYiuW3BQvFK5rTHFmAw3jL70GdTd3j/1qlXg5p dVDUo8vtcJeh0ReQg3j4oVEquCINEayktl//Gxh826urB5Xha+UbRzlucsq1XiUd T1gZFDfvBisSTQtfixUeweQFGBnp6lG7Igy289GMQ+2GVY3q+vhQIP+Gbd5yLMFk c2JFNuy6iGIb53qZYOF/BaOSHTiSD7Sfwy1f4CgqXTQeHl+gjG+yDQTSHP8sCaf5 iaz3wwxB0ERaQpwQ6FM7tINfdmEIocxcukcNw62hhvlpszerF1Td+V1wY3Eh9DGh wHKETWBHZZFGlZVKMorSO0hjskfWiBc95/o65KLeuFeiNDFV0HSf0prvSW3Frk6p dvIFPmSX/qYZeOqK/rjTURNBaVyB9dysKJ2BsoCq6yPJ3sOxGWtJjyp9kPPWZrJV Eq97SxHvI6uv/Le86FZCygb8Fbm6yqdcNVuCI7lxJki8zpfwccQtg4IifwJHpwCK 80Tbq5VtQ8kcodoJxTeE =XGSt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
