Hello List, On 02/01/14 19:57, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jerome BENOIT <g62993...@rezozer.net>, 2013-12-27, 21:02: >>>> I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically >>>> contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of my >>>> predecessor. Meanwhile, kfreebsd support emerged. As FireHOL is meant to >>>> manage iptables, it is de facto meant for linux: >>>> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=firehol (bottom) >>>> Therefore, may I restrict Architecture to linux-any ? >>> You *may* do so, but why bother? >> Because debcheck complains. > > Well, debcheck is a tool, not a deity you have to appease. :) > >>> The package already depends on the architecture-dependent iptables, and is >>> therefore uninstallable on kfreebsd. So there doesn't seem to be any harm >>> to having the package be Architecture: all. >> >> Will setting Architecture to linux-all create more harm ? > > Perhaps you meant "linux-any", because "linux-all" doesn't exist. > > "linux-all" would be the perfect solution to your problem if it existed.
Indeed, I meant linx-any :-) Jerome > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52c5dbf3.8060...@rezozer.net
