On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 16:31 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 04:28:13PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 16:14 +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote: > > Since this discussion took place in 2006, the Linux as a whole would > > probably be too old to be intersting. However, there are big chunks of > > current code having the 'or (at your option) any later version' clause, > > and this software is definitely usable in GPLv3 sense. Not all Linux > > kernel developers agreed with Linus decision at the time, Alan Cox being > > one of them. ... > That doesn't change the fact that hand-waiving about having a Debian > port based parts of kernels from 10 years ago is off-topic on -devel > until you show us the code.
The main idea has now changed to collect a list of GPLv2+ code that can be usable in current and future GPLv3+ projects. Yes, I know it is a large effort, we'll see how it evolves. > So please drop this thread now. Doing so ;) However, see the title change. The idea is still interesting (for me at least, and probably some others). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1373038755.13314.78.ca...@s1499.it.kth.se
