On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:32:00PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > Svante Signell wrote: > > > > I've been thinking about this for some time now. There is a need for a > > gplv3+-compliant Debian-based distribution! Meaning that gplv2 only code > > will not be included! For kernels, kFreeBSD and Hurd will remain, and > > Linux will be several years back of course. Anybody has an idea on how > > old Linux kernel will remain? Comments, ideas, any takers? Criticism I > > assume will be plenty. Maybe even FSF might help here. > > Good luck with the Linux kernel... > > commit 625a8e113925b0bf958e7a4a05b91663908530a1 > Author: linus1 <torva...@linuxfoundation.org> > Date: Sat Sep 5 11:00:00 1992 -0800 > > [PATCH] Linux-0.97.3 (September 5, 1992) > > Hey, we switched to the GPL several months ago, but only now do we > include the license text itself. Apparently everybody expected > everybody else to just know what the GPL was.. > > > Exactly when the switch over took place is left as an exercise for > reader. Since it was over a decade ago,
Over two decades ago. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130703223024.gg27...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
