Hi, On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 04:28:13PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 16:14 +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote: > Since this discussion took place in 2006, the Linux as a whole would > probably be too old to be intersting. However, there are big chunks of > current code having the 'or (at your option) any later version' clause, > and this software is definitely usable in GPLv3 sense. Not all Linux > kernel developers agreed with Linus decision at the time, Alan Cox being > one of them. > > > Similar licensing issues apply to other projects too though, so you > > should try to avoid spreading incorrect information. > > Thank you Uoti, information given should be correct, everything else is > to be treated as FUD.
That doesn't change the fact that hand-waiving about having a Debian port based parts of kernels from 10 years ago is off-topic on -devel until you show us the code. So please drop this thread now. Thanks, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130705143111.gq27...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
