On 2013-05-22 15:39:00 +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > On 05/22/2013 04:50 AM, Uoti Urpala wrote: > >Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >>I went through the various init systems threads again during the last > >>few days. My understanding of the consensus so far is the following: > >> > >>- Both systemd and upstart bring many useful features, and are a > >> clear improvement over sysvinit. > > > >Yes, both are an improvement over sysvinit. > > Hrmm, I have not tested systemd yet, but personally I'm not conviced about > the advantages of upstart: > > - Stops booting *somtimes*, does not provide any information why. I didn't > report a bug yet as an almost black screen won't help in any way how to > figure out why it stopped. Already that stops without any further > information why and where is a sufficiently big design issue, imho. > (Btw, in the mean time I belive this issue is related to /etc/mtab, but I'm > not sure yet.).
Well, a frozen boot without much information can also occur with sysvinit (e.g. due to udev). For instance, I had the following problem in the past: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606192 -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130523003328.ga4...@xvii.vinc17.org
