On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:45:48AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > This is not theoretical. upstart has been PID 1 in Ubuntu since 2006. It > > *is* absolutely dependable and reliable.
> Upstart has had its problems, too [1]. > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/557177 A bug in an upstart job, and your dissatisfaction with how the upstart maintainer responded to the bug report, is entirely orthogonal to Roger's point about complexity in PID 1. > And, honestly, the way this bug was handled left me with little confidence > in upstart. I'm very sad for you. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
