On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:20:24PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I don't get what you want to express: > > > > $ LANG=C apt-cache policy libparse-debcontrol-perl > > $ LANG=C apt-cache policy libdpkg-perl > > > > Both modules have version >= 1.00. > > Module not package, sorry, I thought it was clear from the context.
Sorry, I'm not that involved in Perl and somehow assumed that the package version has some relation to the module version > See: > > /usr/share/doc/libdpkg-perl/README.api > > $ dpkg -L libdpkg-perl|grep 'Hash\.pm'|xargs grep VERSION It seems my assumption is not that wrong: dpkg -L libparse-debcontrol-perl|grep 'DebControl\.pm'|xargs grep VERSION use vars qw($VERSION); $VERSION = '2.005'; So your conclusion from module version >= 1.00 to stability of API remains unclear to me because both look somehow stable. As I have written in my example test code: It does not really matter which one we prefer - both are working perfectly fine. I'll leave the final decision to the maintainer of uscan code who needs to accept the patch. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120821190912.ge23...@an3as.eu