Hi Guillem,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:37:58AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 20:50:31 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:39:34 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > > Dpkg::Control::Hash - parse and manipulate a block of RFC822-like fields
> > > > (libdpkg-perl)
> > > How would you compare this to Jonas solution using
> > > use Parse::DebControl;
> > > ?
> >
> > Not sure how "official" my use of Dpkg::Control::Hash is, so maybe
> > better stick to Jonas' proposal :)
>
> That module is version >= 1.00, so it's a stable and public interface
> that can be used by third party code w/o worrying about backward
> incompatibilities.
I don't get what you want to express:
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy libparse-debcontrol-perl
libparse-debcontrol-perl:
Installed: 2.005-3
Candidate: 2.005-3
Version table:
*** 2.005-3 0
501 http://http.debian.net/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages
50 http://http.debian.net/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy libdpkg-perl
libdpkg-perl:
Installed: 1.16.8
Candidate: 1.16.8
Version table:
*** 1.16.8 0
501 http://http.debian.net/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages
50 http://http.debian.net/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Both modules have version >= 1.00.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120821064239.ga14...@an3as.eu
