On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > On 04/30/2012 04:56 AM, Fernando Lemos wrote: >> I agree that OpenRC would be an improvement over the status >> quo, but migrating *away* from OpenRC later on would be a major pain >> as we would have to support both LSB/sysvinit scripts and OpenRC >> service descriptions for the foreseeable future. >> > Ah? Is this any different with other alternatives like > upstart or systemd?
Yes. The kernel isn't getting any less event-based, so OpenRC would be an interim solution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canvyna-pad0n6bw-k2h4cbsmcwyqfjom3zq-jvmw33qq8dw...@mail.gmail.com
