On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:19:44PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Apr 29, Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote: > > > While sysvinit is clearly inferior, it gives us (Debian) something the > > others do not: control over our own destiny, and the ability to > > modify every aspect of it and the init scripts to fit our needs. Both > > systemd and upstart are largely influenced by third parties. As a > I do not consider settling for obsolete software to be a useful > direction for Debian, nor is NIH a great argument in software design.
Just to be clear, I am by no means suggesting that we should stick with sysvinit. I am merely pointing out that there are important factors to consider /in addition to/ the technical merits of the init system. With systemd we get a technically excellent system, but we are also buying into a whole lot more than that, some good, some bad. Keeping our options open, and evaluating what are options are available and usable is important, and this is the principal reason why I am interested in looking at OpenRC. It doesn't hurt to try it out and see if it meets our needs. Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120429201451.gh28...@codelibre.net
