On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote: > Keeping our options open, and evaluating what are options are > available and usable is important, and this is the principal reason > why I am interested in looking at OpenRC. It doesn't hurt to try it > out and see if it meets our needs.
Agreed on the "keeping our options open" part. But given that the kernel is increasingly event-based, OpenRC seems to be a step backwards. I agree that OpenRC would be an improvement over the status quo, but migrating *away* from OpenRC later on would be a major pain as we would have to support both LSB/sysvinit scripts and OpenRC service descriptions for the foreseeable future. Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canvyna8w36re26qaxeyxegna4e_tqpyrkp3+t1omhaqa4-_...@mail.gmail.com
