On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:08:51AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > I think the fundamental problem is having kFreeBSD in Debian. It's too > > much extra work and problems for limited benefit to a small number of > > people. Holding things hostage with "you have to make this work on > > kFreeBSD too or it won't be allowed at all" arguments will have negative > > effects beyond just init systems. > > Then you are not talking about Debian. Do you want to create your own > distribution? Feel free to do that:)
Uoti's point here has long been recognised and accepted *within* Debian: every architecture bears a cost. The question as to whether the cost of kFreeBSD is too much or not is, well, not universally agreed amongst Debian developers. <http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_policy.html> -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120306100002.GA27642@debian
