Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 14:36 +0000, Ian Jackson a écrit : > It's not just kFreeBSD. Accepting systemd, in the current state, > means permanently tying ourselves to the Linux kernel. > > The Linux kernel project has some serious and ongoing structural > problems and I think it's very important that as a project we keep our > options open.
I think this is a red herring. What systemd achieves is also standardisation for daemon descriptions and the startup system. I don’t have a single doubt that, should an realistic alternative to Linux emerge, it would come with an init system allowing to re-use them with minor changes. This is one of the biggest advantages of using a descriptive system. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1330446341.5874.38.camel@pi0307572
