On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:19:14 +0100 Matthias Klumpp <matth...@tenstral.net> wrote:
> 2012/2/26 Uoti Urpala <uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi>: > > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >> Uoti Urpala <uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi> (26/02/2012): > >> > Is there reason to believe this would be a particular problem > >> > with systemd? Most of the controversy I've seen surrounding > >> > Poettering has been due to people resisting the kind of change > >> > he has championed. I don't remember seeing much about him being > >> > "difficult to work with" in any sense that would make it hard to > >> > contribute to systemd (though not much to the contrary either). > In any case, as was mentioned before, these issues shouldn't have > priority now. Debian should pick the technically best solution, and > finding out which one is the best should be the priority. As soon as > this is decided somehow, we could think of how to support kFreeBSD and > all the other stuff. Surely what it will support (and how it will be supported) would be part of a desision about 'technically best'? thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS) http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
