Russ Allbery wrote: > While this is true, note that the main objection to CLAs is that it limits > the potential field of contributors. One of the other things that *also* > substantially limits the field of contributors is an upstream who is > confrontational and difficult to work with. I'm not sure systemd can > claim the unambiguous high ground here.
Is there reason to believe this would be a particular problem with systemd? Most of the controversy I've seen surrounding Poettering has been due to people resisting the kind of change he has championed. I don't remember seeing much about him being "difficult to work with" in any sense that would make it hard to contribute to systemd (though not much to the contrary either). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1330208259.5387.109.camel@glyph.nonexistent.invalid
