> > > You mention that the upstream author *transformed* the image. > Mechanical > > > transformations (such as compilation of source code) do not normally > have > > > copyright associated with them, so the copyright of cat.pzl would > probably > > > be the same as for cat.jpg. > > > > > yes, would probably... but I think *transformed* image holder is upstream > > author so copyright belong to him or I'm wrong... > > That depends what the transformation *is*. You would need to explain how > it's been transformed for anyone here to give an educated opinion. > Well, it seems upstream-author catch this image and then *transformed* as a .pzl file (puzzle image file) all of this for create jigsaw game. Into upstream source ONLY there are these puzzle images and he mentions about its copyright/licenses, but there aren't jpeg,png... (source files).
Regards, -- Elías Alejandro
