On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:42:20AM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 07:47:25AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: > > debian/copyright should list the names of the actual copyright holders of > > the work. debian-devel is not a great resource for helping you figure out > > who those copyright holders are, but if the upstream author has already told > > you who the copyright holder is, you should list that.
> I'm agree with you. > > You mention that the upstream author *transformed* the image. Mechanical > > transformations (such as compilation of source code) do not normally have > > copyright associated with them, so the copyright of cat.pzl would probably > > be the same as for cat.jpg. > > > yes, would probably... but I think *transformed* image holder is upstream > author so copyright belong to him or I'm wrong... That depends what the transformation *is*. You would need to explain how it's been transformed for anyone here to give an educated opinion. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110722215303.gf...@virgil.dodds.net
