On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:11:50PM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote: > Dear all, > I've just read this thread. What do you think about this [1]
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/07/msg00427.html debian/copyright should list the names of the actual copyright holders of the work. debian-devel is not a great resource for helping you figure out who those copyright holders are, but if the upstream author has already told you who the copyright holder is, you should list that. You mention that the upstream author *transformed* the image. Mechanical transformations (such as compilation of source code) do not normally have copyright associated with them, so the copyright of cat.pzl would probably be the same as for cat.jpg. > Add: > - Previous Debian release include copyright image owner. > - Image license requires link to web site source as a condition. This last part sounds potentially non-free. If this is software that you're planning to include in Debian main, please submit the license to debian-le...@lists.debian.org for public review of its terms. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
