]] Robert Millan | <quote> | If portability was made a mandatory requirement for an init system to | be adopted, | would the systemd porters be willing to implement everything needed | to support on non-Linux ports the packages using a non-traditional init | configuration, in the way they consider appropriate and without causing | a significant burden on the port maintainers? | I think that a clear statement from the systemd maintainers about this | would help concluding this debate. | </quote>
Implement? Sure, I'd be willing to do that or at least help out. Maintain it for a port I don't use, indefinitively? Probably not. I asked a similar question to Md's and didn't get any response about whether there was any interest whatsoever from the kFreeBSD people, so I think his question is entirely appropriate. I think I've said similar things earlier in the thread too, but maybe it hasn't been phrased clearly enough for you to pick up on it. Regards, -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874o2e5wei....@qurzaw.varnish-software.com
