On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:52:30PM +0000, Uoti Urpala wrote: > Adam D. Barratt <adam <at> adam-barratt.org.uk> writes: > > Proof by assertion isn't an argument. If you think kfreebsd sucks then > > you're entitled to that opinion, but please don't seek to frame it as > > some sort of consensus direction on the part of the project because > > "it's obvious". > > What I consider obvious is not direct agreement on "kFreeBSD sucks", but that > it will not become a significant platform for Debian use and development. Do > you seriously expect to see major popularity for it?
Yes. Your point? > > can't at least try our best to support multiple kernels, so there's no > > migration to plan or not plan for (and no, "systemd only supports Linux" > > is not an argument against supporting other kernels). > > I've never argued directly against support for other kernels (if you thought > so > you've misunderstood something). What I've said is that decisions for Linux > should be made without undue concern for niche ports. You clearly misunderstand how Debian works. Anyway, you're mostly trolling (and according to google, that seems to be your regular M.O.), so EOT for me. -- The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by the following formula: pi zz a -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110719222752.ge6...@grep.be
