On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:40:25 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Philipp Kern > > | Actually those build failures are nowadays sent to the PTS for further > | distribution (the "buildd" keyword). I don't know how many are > subscribed | to those notifications, though. (After all, they're not > automatically | sent to the maintainer.) > > Would people be opposed to changing that? I would be quite happy to get > mails if my packages FTBFS on various architectures, and I believe I'm > competent to at least usually see if something fails because of > something obvious or if it looks like a chroot/buildd issue. FWIW, > Ubuntu mails maintainers on build failures (at least in PPAs), and I've > found that to work well.
AFAIK, that service also mails when the build was successful, leading to a lot of noise. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ij9nif$gv8$1...@dough.gmane.org
