On su, 2011-02-13 at 19:13 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > On 02/13/2011 07:00 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > On su, 2011-02-13 at 18:49 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > >> I don;t think that is a good idea, there are way too many people not > >> building > >> and testing their packages properly already, we don't want to give that > >> work to > >> the buildd-admins... > > > > That's something I don't understand. If I upload a broken package, why > > should it be the buildd admin's job to deal with it? Should not I get > > notified of the error, and told to fix it? > > I guess the notifying is what would become the buildd admin's job...
Why is this a manual job, rather than automated? > If people want to not have to build and upload binary packages, they > would better invest their time in setting up a central service that > would build for them and would help in uploading succesful builds > instead of complaining about thrown away binary packages IMHO. I thought this was the purpose of the existing buildd network. -- Blog/wiki/website hosting with ikiwiki (free for free software): http://www.branchable.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297621083.8023.4.ca...@havelock.lan
