Mike Bird <mgb-deb...@yosemite.net> writes: > Those of us who actually administer Linux systems realize that the > proponents of this change are (a) way out of their depth so that (b) > they cannot forsee the consequences of their actions yet (c) they have > the power to carry their actions through and (d) they haven't listened > to reason yet.
Out of interest, how would you propose an independent observer should distinguish between these two cases: * The package maintainers respond to specific expressed complaints, then ignore the complaints and fail to listen to reason. * The package maintainers respond to specific expressed complaints, then consider the complaints and reject them on the basis of reason. How would the independent observer tell which has occurred? -- \ “Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “I think so, | `\ Brain, but if we have nothing to fear but fear itself, why does | _o__) Elanore Roosevelt wear that spooky mask?” —_Pinky and The Brain_ | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874oi1hj55....@benfinney.id.au
