On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:16:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Summarizing the upstream thread, it seems the solution they prefer is > to just ignore dependency_libs when linking dynamically.
That should be reasonable. > Is there any situation where that wouldn't work in Debian? pkg-config has > both Libs/Requires and Libs.private/Requires.private so there must be some > kind of use-case where stuff linking to shared-lib libfoo also has to > link with libbar? Mostly to accomodate gtk+ upstream, who insist that it's reasonable for software to #include <gtk.h> and then use glib types in their code. I don't think this has an analogue in the libtool world. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
